A former Deputy Minister of Information under the Mahama administration, Felix Kwakye Ofosu has commended Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa and Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah for jointly petitioning the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) to investigative the deaths that occurred during last year’s elections.
In his view, of all the independent accountability institutions, CHRAJ has proven the most effective with a history of holding public officials to account in a manner not seen with other agencies of state..
“Of all the independent accountability institutions, CHRAJ has proven the most effective with a history of holding public officials to account in a manner not seen with other agencies of state. It is entirely appropriate therefore that the Honorables Ablwakwa and Buah have filed a complaint before CHRAJ to look into the callous slaughter of 8 Ghanaians during the 2020 elections.
“Governmental complicity is clearly evident in these extra judicial killings and this should explain why there has been such non-chalance and total lack of concern from the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces whose men did the shooting.
“He failed to even acknowledge the occurrence of the killings, empathize with the bereaved families and assure the nation of action to bring those responsible for these killings to book in the two State of Nation Addresses he delivered in the immediate aftermath of their occurrence.
“Sufficient intent of the desire to use violence to secure electoral victory was served at Ayawso West Wuogon when state sponsored terrorists rained violence of innocent citizens as part of a strategy to retain the seat for the NPP. Hopefully, this lawlessness and impunity that has state and governmental sanction should be punished no matter how long it takes,” Mr Kwakyte Ofosu said in a Facebook post on Wednesday August 25.
The complaints of Mr. Okudzeto Ablakwa who is the Member of Parliament for the North Tongu Constituency in the Volta Region and Mr. Armah-Kofi Buah also Member of Parliament for the Ellembele Constituency in the Western Region, are specifically lodged against the Minister of the Interior, the Minister of Defence as well as the Ghana Police Service and the Ghana Armed Forces.
“The Minister for the Interior is the appointee of His Excellency the President of the Republic of Ghana and has oversight responsibility for the Ghana Police service.
“The Minister of Defence is the appointee of His Excellency the President of the Republic of Ghana and has oversight responsibility for the Ghana Armed Forces.
“The Inspector-General of the Ghana Police Service is by virtue of article 202 of the 1992 Constitution, the head of the Police Service ‘responsible for the operational control’ and ‘the administration’ of the Police Service.
“The Chief of Defence Staff is by virtue of article 213 of the 1992 Constitution, responsible for the operational control and command of the Ghana Armed Forces. During the general elections held in the Republic of Ghana in or about December 7, 2020, the Ghana Police Service and the Ghana Armed Forces established a National Election Security Taskforce (NESTF) to support the effort to ensure smooth and transparent conduct of the said elections. This was necessary for purposes of safeguarding the democratic values and principles of free and fair elections.
“This effort was also necessary to provide citizens of the Republic of Ghana including voters with security during the conduct of the elections. Apart from the NESTF, there were other members of the Police Service and Ghana Armed Forces who played diverse roles during the period of the 2020 Presidential and Parliamentary elections.
“The complaint is restricted to the Techiman South, Odododiodio, Ablekuma Central, and Savelugu constituencies in the Bono East, Greater Accra and Northern Regions of the Republic of Ghana respectively.
“The complaint relates to the manner in which the Ghana Police Service and the Ghana Armed Forces discharged their constitutional and statutory mandates in the constituencies mentioned above.
In the case of the Ghana Armed Forces, their conduct in furtherance of the purpose of the NESTF did not promote the development of Ghana as prescribed by article 210(3) of the 1992 Constitution, as their conduct caused damage to life, limb and property.
Regarding the Ghana Police service, the manner in which they carried out their functions to further the purpose of the NESTF undermined their constitutional obligation under article 200(3) of performing their “traditional role of maintaining law and order.”
During the polls, a total of 61 electoral and post-electoral incidents were recorded nationwide, the Ghana Police Service announced in a statement on Wednesday, December 9, 2020.
The statement said 21 of the incidents were true cases of electoral violence, six of which involved gunshots, resulting in the death of five.
The Police’s statement further noted that there were several fake news about supposed electoral violence.
“However, between 0700 hours of 7th December, 2020 and 1000 hours of 9th December, 2020; the Joint Operation Centre of the NESTF has recorded a total of sixty-one (61) electoral and post electoral incidents nationwide. Twenty-one of the incidents are true cases of electoral violence, six of which involve gunshots resulting in the death of five,” the statement from the Police emphasized.
In the Techiman South constituency, the petition said “At about 3:00 pm [15:00 hours GMT], on the 8th day of December 2020, armed officers attacked, violently abused, and in some instances killed civilians in the Techiman South constituency. The victims of their actions were unarmed civilians who had turned out peacefully in front of the Brokyepem Hall close to the Municipal Assembly to exercise their franchise.
“The officers carried out the acts referred to in paragraph 1 above, by indiscriminately shooting into the crowd of voters and observers at the said polling station. It is important to underscore the fact that at the time the uniformed officers decided to, and indeed indiscriminately shot at the voters and observers at the Brokyepem Hall in the Techiman South constituency, there was no imminent and compelling threat to justify the use of, let alone the excessive and rather reckless use of such force against the unarmed civilians who were lawfully exercising their constitutional right at the polls.”